AeroFEM official product logo

AeroFEM

Blast and impact simulation for glazing systems

The problem

Glazing is where a blast reaches people

A façade under blast or impact loading fails at its glazing first, and the response depends on the load, the pane dimensions and the way the layers are built up.

AeroFEM Dynamics computes that response from a defined load and a defined glazing configuration, and produces a report from it.

What the analysis coversLoad · dimensions and layers · damping · report

The scenario is set before anything runs: the load definition used for the glazing calculation, the window dimensions and the glazing layers, and a damping selection.

The defined scenario is then executed, the computed response inspected, and the report generated from it — the same sequence whether it is run locally or through the browser interface.

This is a defined glazing analysis rather than a general structural tool. It is the one application the reviewed workflow covers.

Product overview

AeroFEM brings a defined glazing analysis into local and browser-based workflows: configure the load and glazing system, run the calculation, inspect computed response and prepare a report.

Status

Demonstrated glazing application · commercial availability not confirmed

Evidence boundary

Simulation footage is not a certification test. Commercial availability is not confirmed.

Capabilities

  • Load definition
  • Glazing configuration
  • Computed blast and impact response
  • Browser workflow
  • Report generation
Discuss the workflowGet product help
01Blast response

Computed glazing response under a defined blast load.

What the clip shows

A glazing-system finite-element model responds to a blast load. This is a simulation of a defined scenario, not a certification test, and nothing in it establishes standards compliance or a certified glazing build-up.

02Impact response

A localised load applied to a glazing panel.

What the clip shows

An impact simulation applies a localised load to a glazing panel — the second of the two demonstrated load cases. As with the blast case, it is a computed response and not a test result.

03Browser workflow · AeroFEM Cloud

The same defined glazing task, configured and submitted through a browser.

What the clip shows

AeroFEM Cloud puts the defined glazing workflow behind a focused browser interface: the form configures the simulation, the task is submitted and its progress followed, and the generated report is presented at the end. The footage is evidence for configuration, submission, progress and report delivery only. It does not establish hosting, availability or service terms.

The demonstrated workflow

Define the load, configure the glazing, run and report

The reviewed workflow stays within one glazing analysis: a defined load, a defined window, the computed response and the report generated from it. The same defined task is what the browser interface carries.

  1. 01

    Define

    Enter the load definition used for the glazing calculation, before the run starts.

  2. 02

    Configure

    Set the window dimensions and the glazing layers. The demonstrated configuration also includes a damping selection.

  3. 03

    Run and review

    Execute the defined scenario, inspect the computed response, and generate the report.

  4. 04

    Deliver

    The same task runs through the browser interface, where progress is followed and the finished report is presented for download.

Simulation footage is not a certification test.

Aerobase — AeroFEM Dynamics, evidence boundary
What the footage showsTwo load cases, one browser flow
Blast and impact
Two demonstrated load cases on glazing systems: a blast load across the panel, and a localised impact. Both are computed responses.
Local and browser
The same defined analysis is shown twice — run locally, and configured and submitted through the browser interface with the report returned at the end.
What this does not establishNot a certification test · one application · availability unconfirmed
  • Simulation footage is not a certification test. Nothing here establishes standards compliance, a certified glazing build-up, or a threat rating.
  • The evidence covers one defined glazing application. It does not establish general structural coverage.
  • Commercial availability, hosting and service terms are not asserted.

Sources

  • Reviewed AeroFEM application and the supplied blast, impact and browser-workflow footage. Aerobase design review, 20 July 2026.