Erik Berglund
M.Sc.

Erik supports research in material modelling and numerical simulation. He contributes to building, testing and refining models for practical engineering applications.
Area of focus
Material modeling & simulations
Conference contributions
It Runs — but Is It Right? Ontology-Constrained Synthesis of Physics-Valid Simulation Tools for AI Agents
Xavier, M.; Berglund, D.; Babu, B.; Berglund, E.
MSE · 2026
Abstract
A simulation tool can run flawlessly and still be wrong. For AI agents that synthesize tools for other AI agents [4], this is a particularly dangerous failure: inconsistent units, incompatible material states, or use of a solver outside its validated domain can produce convincing outputs that are physically meaningless. We present an ontology-constrained approach for PHASES [1], aligned with EMMO and OSMO [2,3], in which AI agents synthesize new application-level simulation tools from existing validated solvers and approved external physics components. Given a request such as “build a laser-hardening tool,” the agent first constructs a semantic blueprint that specifies the required quantities, units, material states, physical capabilities, solver dependencies, and operating envelopes. It then assembles a bounded workflow, namely laser energy deposition, transient heat transfer, PHASES transformation kinetics, and hardness and case-depth post-processing. The agent generates the interfaces, coupling logic, parameterization, and post-processing, but does not invent new governing physics. Before registration, each candidate undergoes dimensional, semantic, state-transfer, and applicability checks, followed by sandboxed execution and physics-based validation. If a required capability is missing or incompatible, synthesis stops safely. An accepted tool carries a machine-readable validity manifest that records its operating limits, verification evidence, and ontology, material, and solver versions. The tool can then be reused by PHASES AI or other LLM agents through a tool registry and MCP. We will evaluate the approach on custom metallurgical simulation requests that require different combinations of PHASES and approved external solvers, measuring task success, correct capability selection, safe rejection, envelope compliance, and silent physical errors. The aim is to create AI-generated simulation tools that do more than run: they know and expose the limits within which they are right.
Abstract PDFPHASES Agent: an AI agent for physics-based digital metallurgy
Berglund, D.; Babu, B.; Xavier, M.; Berglund, E.
ESTEP Annual Event · 2026
Abstract
Predictive metallurgy is often promised and rarely delivered. Most tools stop at a property lookup or a single calibrated model, and the few that reach further tend to stay inside a specialist’s script. Phases (https://phases.aerobase.se), built by Aerobase Innovations AB, works differently. It is an AI agent that runs physics-based phase-transformation models from a plain-language request and returns a finished simulation with plots, and it already drives a validated automotive process chain from hot forming through welding to crash. This abstract describes the platform and the physics behind it, then shows the result that makes the case: a single composition-dependent model, applied across a full press-hardening chain, predicts how the chemistry of recycled steel changes crash performance.
Abstract PDF
Our skills
- Computational material science
- Product development
- FEM
- Statistical modeling
- Cloud-based simulator
- Material models
- Customised simulation platform
- Machine learning
- AI agentic engineering

